Watch this! Blowjob – Andy Warhol (1964)

I just found that video online. It’s pretty amazing that Andy Warhol did that in 1964!
It’s simple, elegant, erotic and fresh !
You don’t see anything except a man enjoying the moment.
You like?

Dave


There are 20 comments

Add yours
  1. Charles

    Can’t tell if he is really enjoying it or the guy giving is just a bad cocksucker…..Doesn’t show much pleasure to me……

  2. Gr8t4t8

    Interesting. Very interesting. Terrifically creative, but too long. Got boring. If it wasn’t titled blow job I wouldn’t have known what was happening. Looks more like he’s beating off than getting his dick sucked.

  3. Jose

    Thought this video was kind of dumb, didn’t hardly show anything I wouldn’t buy the video, I probably could of just jerked off in front of my mirror, upgrade please

  4. largorob

    Looks more like he was on an acid trip.
    But I watched on my phone at work.
    Im in a better mood now and on big screen.
    Lets see if it does anything for me now.

  5. largorob

    Ok the dark shadows distracted me. I wonder if that was on the film or some anomally covering to digital? i wonder what happened in the middle when it went white?
    and was that him cumming at the end his shoulders hunched and his head went back and his lips quivered.
    then cut to him smoking….

  6. ChipD

    There’s nothing really revelatory about this film, even if it was made by Andy Warhol in 1964. Warhol indulged in such eccentricities throughout his career, to greater and lesser degrees. What’s amazing is that people still find it interesting!!! Yes, it’s art and was artrageous for it’s time…long before internet porn became as easy to find as the click of a button wherever you happen to be.

  7. Shazam Chinette

    The guy was not really getting oral sex. it was an act, to get attention. Warhol did like shock and attention, as well as speed pills.

  8. Eddie

    Whether art or porn, the subject did not really seem into it, no enthusiasm or show of deep pleasure, in fact, he seemed fairly disinterested and too conscious of being filmed. Even art should contain something intense in emotion, there was nothing intense about this, no wonder most found it boring.

  9. axemelater

    Interesting to read the reactions….
    ranging from disappointment because it isnt the porn they expect…
    to disappointment because the guy’s facial expression
    isn’t just like the ooh and aah in the porns they watch…
    and ofcourse it is boring…
    we all prefer to zap to the best scenes…
    “i wouldn’t buy the video must be the one warhol wouldve liked best”
    none of them has any clue what this movie is about….

  10. David

    Andy Warhol once said of himself, “I’m the greatest con man that has ever lived ” because he was, he along with Robert Mapplethorpe, Kieth Haring and a few other’s came along just at the right moment, not because they were great talents, but because they were there at just the right moment in history – I know because I was there to.

  11. bigblackbear

    For 1964 this was earth shattering, there was no Internet, there was no porn as you know now. This was the cutting edge from a homophobic society. Don’t compare it to what you see today. It was almost 50 years ago before most of you found it “boring” was even born. I know because I was around.


Post a new comment

Thanks! Like us to stay in touch with latests posts!